Publication:
Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kamil Serdar Oğur ve Gülhan Oğur Kararı, Başvuru Numarası: 2014/7273, Karar Tarihi: 20.04.2017 Karar İncelemesi

Simple item page
dc.contributorİstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi / Hukuk Fakültesi / Özel Hukuk Bölümü / Medeni Usul ve İcra İflas Hukuku Anabilim Dalıtr_TR
dc.contributor.authorAykut, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorID242235tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T14:07:29Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T14:07:29Z
dc.date.issued2017-07
dc.description.abstractThe fact that the merits of the case couldn’t be examined for many years by virtue of judgments regarding –rejection of venue and lack of jurisdiction given by different court different courts resulted in violation of right to trial within a reasonable time and such a situation is unacceptable in a state of law. The judgment of the Constitutional Court dated 20.04.2017 has been examined in this scope and we came to the same conclusion with the Constitutional Court that to spend nearly 5 years to fulfill the procedural shortcomings because of misjudgments would be a violation of right to trial within a reasonable time.tr_TR
dc.identifier9 / 92tr_TR
dc.identifier9 / 92tr_TR
dc.identifier9 / 92tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn1309-4327
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11413/3250
dc.language.isoen_UStr_TR
dc.publisherSeçkin Yayıncılıktr_TR
dc.relationFasikül Aylık Hukuk Dergisitr_TR
dc.subjectJudicial Remedy, Lack of Jurisdiction, Lack of Competence, the Right to a Fair Trial, the Right to Trial within a Reasonable Timetr_TR
dc.titleAnayasa Mahkemesinin Kamil Serdar Oğur ve Gülhan Oğur Kararı, Başvuru Numarası: 2014/7273, Karar Tarihi: 20.04.2017 Karar İncelemesitr_TR
dc.typeArticletr_TR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Hukuk Fakültesi / Faculty of Law